7 minute read | July.01.2024
The U.S. Department of the Treasury proposed regulations on June 21, 2024, that would prohibit certain outbound investments by U.S. persons in Chinese companies focused on semiconductors and microelectronics, quantum computing and information technologies, and artificial intelligence.
The proposal would also require U.S. persons to notify Treasury of other types of outbound investment. The proposed rule would implement President Biden’s August 9, 2023, Executive Order 14105, discussed in our prior alert.
The proposal does not impose any immediate legal requirements. Treasury is seeking public comments by August 4, 2024. It is unlikely that Treasury will issue a final rule before the fourth quarter of this year.
Apart from foreign policy-based sanctions, the proposal departs from a long-standing U.S. policy of open and unqualified environment for such investment. As most recently stated by Treasury, the new policy is that the United States supports “an open investment environment where consistent with the protection of U.S. national security.”
The proposed rule would:
The proposed rule would not establish a process for the U.S. government to review or license transactions. But the U.S. government would be able to nullify, void or otherwise require divestment of any prohibited transaction.
Treasury’s proposal also includes a process for voluntarily disclosing potential violations and provides for civil and criminal penalties on persons who violate the rule.
The proposed rule would apply to activities of “U.S. persons.” A “U.S. person” would be any U.S. citizen, lawful permanent resident, entity organized under U.S. law or any person in the United States. A foreign parent or foreign employer of a U.S. person would not be a U.S. person simply because it has an affiliate or employees in the United States.
Under the proposed rule, U.S. persons would have to take reasonable steps to ensure that their “controlled foreign entities” (e.g., subsidiaries) forgo transactions that would be prohibited if executed by a U.S. person. A U.S. person would also be required to notify authorities of a transaction by its controlled foreign entity that would be a notifiable transaction if executed by a U.S. person.
The proposed rule would pertain to activities of U.S. persons and controlled foreign entities with respect to “covered transactions” involving “covered foreign persons.”
“Covered transactions” would include certain investment and similar transactions if a U.S. person has knowledge of the involvement of a “covered foreign person.” This would include acquisitions of equity interests or contingent equity interests in covered foreign persons, certain debt financings, conversions of equity interests or debt to equity interests, greenfield or brownfield investments that are intended to result in establishing covered foreign persons or covered activities, certain joint ventures and certain limited partnership investments.
A “covered foreign person” would include:
A person of a country of concern would include:
“Covered activities” would include activities associated with “prohibited transactions” or “notifiable transactions” (discussed in greater detail below).
Prohibited Transactions Covered transactions in which a covered foreign person or joint venture engages in any of the following activities: |
Notifiable Transactions Covered transactions in which a covered foreign person or joint venture engages in any of the following activities: |
|
Semiconductors and microelectronics |
|
|
Quantum information technologies A “quantum computer” would be a computer that performs computations that harness the collective properties of quantum states, such as superposition, interference or entanglement. |
|
N/A |
AI Systems An “AI system” would be either (i) a machine-based system that uses data inputs to perceive real and virtual environments and, for a given set of human-defined objectives, make predictions, recommendations, or decisions influencing real or virtual environments, or (ii) any data system, software, hardware, application, tool or utility that operates in whole or in part using such a machine-based system. |
|
|
Prohibited transactions would be covered transactions that are not notifiable or excepted transactions (discussed below) in which a covered foreign person or a joint venture between a U.S. person and a Chinese person engages in an activity listed in the prohibited transactions column of the table above. The proposed rule would also prohibit U.S. persons’ covered transactions involving a covered foreign person included on any U.S. government blacklist performing any of the activities listed in the table above.
Notifiable transactions would be covered transactions that are not prohibited or excepted transactions in which a covered foreign person or a joint venture between a U.S. person and a Chinese person engages in an activity listed in the notifiable transactions column of the table above. U.S. persons involved in notifiable transactions would be required to notify Treasury of each such transaction within 30 days of the transaction’s completion.
A U.S. person who discovers, after completing a transaction, that it was covered would have 30 days to notify Treasury.
After a notification, Treasury would be authorized to contact the U.S. person with questions or document requests related to the transaction or compliance with the rule.
A transaction that otherwise has the attributes of a covered transaction (i.e., either a prohibited transaction or a notifiable transaction) generally would be treated as covered only if the U.S. person involved in the transaction has knowledge at the time of the transaction that it involves or would result in the establishment of a covered foreign person (or would result in a Chinese person’s engagement in a new covered activity). The proposal includes detailed provisions on the meaning of the applicable “knowledge” standard.
A U.S. person would be required to perform reasonable and appropriate diligence to determine whether a transaction is covered. If, however, a U.S. person undertakes a reasonable and diligent inquiry and still does not know that a transaction is covered, Treasury ordinarily would not conclude that the person knew the transaction was covered.
The proposed rule would except certain types of transactions from the rule, including: